| REFLEX LEAGUE | REFLEX LEAGUE | |||||
| Minutes of the Annual Meeting held at Havant Indoor Bowls Club | Minutes of the Annual Meeting held at Havant Indoor Bowls Club | |||||
| on Monday 8th February 1993 | on Wednesday 2nd February 1994 | |||||
| 1. The meeting was attended by representatives from each of the participating clubs: | 1. The meeting was attended by representatives from each of the participating clubs: | |||||
| Bedhampton - C. Lloyd & E. Mears | Bedhampton - C. Lloyd & J. Tautz | |||||
| Denmead - A. Butcher, K. Morgan and J. Marks (initially as guests). | Denmead - F. Ketley & J. Marks | |||||
| Cowplain - E. Wilkinson & G. Taylor. | Cowplain - E. Wilkinson, C. Stephens & K. Stephens | |||||
| Hayling Island - M. Sidebottom & O. Williams. | Hayling Island - M. Sidebottom & O. Williams. | |||||
| IBM - S. Lloyd & M. Tregaskis | IBM - M. Tregaskis | |||||
| Leigh Park - M. Keller & P. Lind. | Leigh Park - M. Keller & F. Miller | |||||
| Purbrook - J. Davis & W.E Hunt. | Purbrook - D.S. Mountain & D. Dowding | |||||
| Southbourne - A. Odell & E. Baylis. | Southbourne - A. Odell & G. Bishop | |||||
| Waterlooville - M. Underhay & F. Brown. | Waterlooville - M. Underhay & F. Brown. | |||||
| 2. The meeting commenced at 6.30pm | 2. The meeting commenced at 6.00pm. | |||||
| 3. The minutes of the meeting held on 27th Jan 1992 were presented and accepted as a true | 3. The minutes of the meeting held on 8th Feb 1993 were presented and accepted as a true | |||||
| record. Proposed by E. Wilkinson and seconded by C. Lloyd. | record. Proposed by F. Ketley and seconded by O. Williams. | |||||
| 4. The statement of accounts were presented. | 4. The statement of accounts were presented. | |||||
| For convenience this was separated into that related to the Presentation Evening and that | As is the custom this was separated into that related to the Presentation Evening and that | |||||
| related to general running costs incurred by the club officers. | related to general running costs incurred by the club officers. | |||||
| The Presentation Evening due to its enormous success and response from club bowlers had | The Presentation Evening due to its enormous success and response from club bowlers had | |||||
| produced a profit of £120.10p. | produced a profit of £120.10p. | |||||
| General operating costs had been kept low due to the facilities allowed to the secretary by | General operating costs were again quite low amounting to only £4.80 giving a total in hand | |||||
| his employer and a sum of £6.31 was held in cash, expenditure being onliy £2.64p. | cash sum of £1.51 + £126.43 = £127.94p. | |||||
| The statements were accepted. Proposed by S. Lloyd and seconded by M. Kellar. | The statements were accepted. Proposed by M. Underhay and seconded by F. Brown. | |||||
| With the cash in hand there was no need to levy any of the Clubs within the league. | With the cash in hand there was no need to levy any of the Clubs within the league. | |||||
| A short discussion took place on the amount of cash we needed to run the presentation | ||||||
| 5. M. Underhay was elected to the position of chairman. | evening which is our only major operating expense. Tony Odell was of the opinion that £120 was | |||||
| Proposed by M. Tgregaskis and seconded by A. Odell. | sufficient and he should know as he organises it. | |||||
| M. Tregaskis was elected to the position of secretary. | ||||||
| Proposed by M. Sidebottom and seconded by O. Williams. | 5. M. Underhay was elected to the position of chairman. | |||||
| Proposed by F. Brown and seconded by M. Tregaskis. | ||||||
| 6. The 1992 presentatiion evening was then discussed and it was agreed by all that it | M.Tregaskis was elected to the position of secretary. | |||||
| had been as in 1991 a very enjoyable evening. Holding the event at the Southbourne Social | Proposed by M. Kellar and seconded by M. Sidebottom. | |||||
| Club provided the ideal environment for the function. Tony Odell, his wife and his fellow | ||||||
| bowls team members were thanked for their efforts in organising the evening. | 6. A vote of thanks was then given to M. Tregaskis for his contribution to the running of the | |||||
| As last year it was noted that the support from clubs was variable. It was requested that | league. | |||||
| all clubs should make an effort to support the evening even if they were not one of the | ||||||
| winners. | 7. The 1993 presentation evening was then discussed and it was agreed by all that it had again | |||||
| The date provisionally set for the 1993 evening was set at the 10th Oct 1993, format to be | been a very enjoyable evening. Holding the event at the Southbourne Social Club provided the | |||||
| as for the 1992 evening. This would be subject to the agreement of the Southbourne | ideal environment for the function. Tony Odell, his wife and his fellow bowls team members were | |||||
| Social Club. This date was confirmed post meeting by Tony Odell. | thanked for their efforts in organising the evening. | |||||
| As last year it was noted that the support from clubs was variable. It was requested that all | ||||||
| clubs should make an effort to support the evening even if they were not one of the winners. | ||||||
| 7. Correspondence. | The date provisionally set for the 1994 evening was set at the 9th Oct 1994, format to be as for the | |||||
| 1. A letter from Denmead Bowling Club which had recently been formed had been received | 1994 evening. | |||||
| and the Club requested that it may join the Reflex League in order to provide some | This would be subject to the agreement of the Southbourne Social Club. | |||||
| competitive bowling for its members since it was limited to friendlies only. | This date was confirmed post meeting by Tony Odell. | |||||
| The Leigh Park representatives proposed that Denmead be admitted only when they were | ||||||
| accepted by the P&D and County Bowling Associations. At present there were no | 8. Correspondence | |||||
| facilities for both ladies & men at the ground. Leigh Park stated that they had no | A query from Denmead Bowling Club had been received regarding the wearing of trousers by | |||||
| prejudice against Denmead and would welcome the club into the Reflex league if these | lady bowlers. | |||||
| conveniences were provided. Denmead stated that they hoped to have County affiliation | A general discussion took place and there was a fair amount of disagreement between | |||||
| in 93 & P&D in 94. A portakabin to provide facilities and a toilet were being installed at | representatives. It was pointed out by Southbourne that the wearing of trousers during play | |||||
| the ground in Spring 93. | contravened the English Ladies Bowling Association rules. Finally a resolution was put to the | |||||
| After further discussion the Leigh Park proposal was withdrawn. | meeting that ladies should abide by the Association rules and that trousers should not be worn. | |||||
| E. Williams proposed and O. Williams seconded the motion that Denmead be admitted to | Proposed by C. Stephens and seconded by A. Odell. The proposal was passed by 10 to 6 with | |||||
| the Reflex League. This was carried. | 2 abstentions. | |||||
| The secretary then welcomed the Denmead club representatives into the meeting. | ||||||
| A discussion on the provision of additional trophies was entered into but it was concluded | ||||||
| 2. Leigh Park had requested clarification on the league rules under which the Reflex League | that the situation of just two trophies was adequate for the league. | |||||
| was run. | ||||||
| M. Kellar explained that the question "how were the rules drawn up" was asked by a club | 9. Any Other Business | |||||
| member. | Bedhampton informed the meeting that they were to have a new clubhouse built and as the | |||||
| The secretary stated: | building of the premises was due to start in mid July could they play all their games prior to | |||||
| As far as he was aware there was no constitution for the league. | this date at home. No problem. Lucky old Bedhampton to have a new clubhouse. | |||||
| The Reflex League had been setup by a group of clubs within the Havant Sports company | ||||||
| called Reflex. This company no longer traded. | D. Williams asked if a club could enter 2 sides into the league but the majority of members | |||||
| The league was based on a mixed triple basis to give players of both sexes more competitive | felt that the fixture list was already under pressure and therefore not a realistic situation. | |||||
| events in the season. | At this time no exansion in the league could be realised. | |||||
| The rules were agreed, amended or included by discussion and voting at the general meetings | ||||||
| held throughout the seasons. | 10. The match fixtures were then arranged and the meeting closed at 8.00. | |||||
| The rules as he understood had been summarised and distributed last year together with | ||||||
| the minutes of the AGM. | ||||||
| Some discussion took place where it was generally agreed that clubs were aware of the | ||||||
| ground rules and that it was up to individual clubs to operate their own selection policy. | ||||||
| The emphasis was that this was a friendly league designed to give pleasure to bowlers of | ||||||
| all abilities and sexes. | ||||||
| 3. Some queries had arisen regarding postponed matches. | ||||||
| Problems had arisen due to Reflex matches being played at times when rinks were taken by | ||||||
| competitions and were in conflict with these fixed dates. After a lively debate it was agreed | ||||||
| that clubs could mutually agree to postpone matches by reason of conflict with competitions | ||||||
| occurred. It was noted that since 5 rinks were required and all other competitions have | ||||||
| priority over the Reflex fixture it is quite easy to have fixture problems. | ||||||
| 8. Any Other Business | ||||||
| M. Underhay proposed that the league be renamed so that the reference to "reflex" was | ||||||
| removed. The motion was defeated. | ||||||
| M. Underhay proposed that the league games be played in whites. | ||||||
| Since as members quickly pointed out most games were evening fixtures and players who | ||||||
| worked had limited time between leaving work and play this would be difficult to comply | ||||||
| with - the motion was defeated. | ||||||
| 9. The match fixtures were then arranged and the meeting closed at 8.00. | ||||||